The modern Olympics present themselves as evolved. But what good is this evolution if, even when these formal systems and counseling programs exist, the broader culture and media narrative still discourages Olympians from fully using them?
Now, national delegations, specifically Team USA, travel with sports psychologists and mental health providers who give on-site 24/7 care for athletes performance stress, anxiety management and mental health crises. Wellness initiatives placed by the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee are promoted alongside medal counts. Athletes speak more openly now about anxiety, burnout, emotional strain and mental health than in previous generations. On paper, mental health support and awareness is no longer an afterthought. But in reality, cultural change is harder than adding staff and counseling resources.
Mental health programs at the Olympics have expanded and given support to its athletes, yet the system remains built around performance, medal placement and national prestige, shaping how safe it feels to step back. This “medal-first” mindset embedded in Olympic culture does not disappear simply because mental health resources are accessible.
In many countries, funding for national sport programs and for Olympic teams is directly tied to medal results and placement finishes. Sponsorship bonuses, media coverage and training opportunities for Olympic athletes depend on how an athlete performs during competitions before the Games even start. However well they skate, ski, snowboard or perform on the beam, influences the sponsorships they get for the Games, creating even more structural pressure in the already intense culture.
This means even more intensity in the minds of Olympic athletes. When performance determines funding, medals become currency. That structure creates pressure that is not accidental, but entirely institutional – built on performing the best in hopes of impressing one’s sponsor. How much institutional pressure like that can an athlete take before breaking?
In an environment where results shape career paths and national integrity, accessing mental health support can feel secondary to taking in the moment of competing at the Olympics. In the world of sports, physical performance cannot be separated from psychological well being. No athlete can compete at their highest level of ability if their mental foundation is rocky. A body cannot function properly if the head is unstable.
The culture surrounding the Olympics reinforces this pressure. When February rolls around, the Olympics are probably one of the most heavily covered and reported events of that year. Media coverage often aims to celebrate resilience, toughness and sacrifice as traits of greatness in athletes. But what we should be paying attention to when we come across Olympic coverage, is how different headlines reinforce certain perspectives. Headlines usually end up praising athletes who “push through pain” or “battle adversity,” completely undermining the truth that Olympic athletes are humans first. These reinforce the narrative that strength means persistence at any cost to an athlete.
When an Olympian steps back to prioritize their mental health, the public always has a reaction. Those reactions can be mixed – supportive, but also skeptical. That reaction itself reflects the performance culture and media reaction that often makes stepping back feel like a risk in the first place. They are humans are they not? In the recent 2026 Milano-Cortina Winter Olympics, Team USA figure skating sensation Ilia Malinin, 21, failed to capture the gold in his free skate program on Friday, Feb. 13, taking eighth place after falling twice. The result stunned audiences, including Malinin and his father, that almost every online news site was quick to publish stories on Malinin's upsetting skate.
Headlines quickly framed the moment forever. From a USA Today opinion piece on the day of the fall, the headline read, “Ilia Malinin's Olympic nightmare just played out with a terrible performance.” Another one from The Guardian a day later read, “Fall of the Quad God: Ilia Malinin finds he is all too human under the Olympic spotlight.” Instead of leaving the narrative open, the words “nightmare,” “terrible performance” and “all too human,” build a media frame that probably created even more humiliation and shame that Malinin already feels.
It’s no wonder other athletes and public figures watching him at home shared kind words and messages of support online, and why Malinin immediately emphasized that mental health matters.
A similar moment unfolded during the 2020 Tokyo Games when American gymnast and Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles, 28, withdrew from multiple events to prioritize her mental health – a decision that, as widely reported by outlets like ESPN and The Guardian, drew both praise and criticism. The divide from the public revealed how deep the Olympic culture is rooted with vulnerability even at the highest level of competition in sports.
Subtle narratives can frame vulnerability as unexpected and a “nightmare” rather than normalized. This is exactly what the USOPC mental health resources are for: providing support to athletes when a performance goes wrong. Having access to a sports psychologist or a mental health provider within the Olympics does not erase the cultural expectation to compete no matter what. They are human and it is okay to fail. Until rest and recovery are framed as responsible and normal, rather than just controversial and shocking, the stigma around stepping away will remain. Public expectations will always be influenced by the media.
The Olympics claim to celebrate excellence, resilience and potential, no matter how well an athlete performs in their sport. But these ideas should not require the act of silent endurance, and resilience should not only mean restricting struggle. Expanding mental health resources is true progress, but true reform means shifting the narrative of performance versus visibility. Until stepping back or emphasizing mental health is treated as responsible rather than disappointing, Olympians will continue to compete against a culture that equates their worth to medals. If the games really do value greatness in their athletes, they must equally value the mind as much as they do the podium.
How UNC's Disc Golf Club is an Underrated Hole-in-One for Campus Sports
