What is Identity Evropa?

Identity Evropa flyers were found on the UNC campus a few months ago. prompting a response from the dean of the College of Humanities and Social Sciences. Photo courtesy of identityevropa.com.

You may have seen their flyers attached to bulletin boards somewhere on campus. Identity Evropa has made their public announcement on UNC’s campus and their platform is very clear: priding themselves on white identity, anti-multiculturalism, anti-multiracialism, and accelerating the overall causes promoted by the overarching Alt-Right and Neo-Nazi movements.

According to a report released earlier this year by the Anti-Defamation League, the U.S. experienced a 258 percent increase in the number of white supremacist propaganda circulated and published around college campuses.

For the last several months, Identity Evropa, an American neo-Nazi organization – defined by the ADL as a white supremacist hate group – has been a topic of concern and debate since making their presence known at UNC. Although depictions of these flyers range from innocuous to radical, their message remains consistent: in their eyes, America is a white nation and diversity is a fabricated lie.

“We want to combat the diversity cult that has propagated itself not only on college campuses but throughout much of America,” said Nathan Damigo, founder of Identity Evropa, at his former college California State University, Stanislaus. However, the group associates themselves with “cultural marxism.”

The Center on Extremism has tracked over 346 instances since September 2017 in which “leaflets, stickers, posters, and banners have appeared on more than 200 campuses across the country.” Covering the period between Sept. 1 and Dec. 18, data published by the ADL also reveals 146 documented incidents of this propaganda in schools – this number is more than triple the rate for the same period studied the previous year, which stands at 41.  


These numbers indicate not just the increasing rate of these hate groups’ activities, but also Identity Evropa’s growing reach in college communities: out of the 346 incidents reported earlier, the group is responsible for nearly half of them. The Southern Poverty Law Center has also tracked 329 “flyering” incidents on 241 different college campuses, finding the group had displayed 154 of them.  

Groups like Identity Evropa didn’t start procuring widespread attention until the violent and tumultuous riots in Charlottesville last year.  It was here where Damigo could be seen leading his group, next to the instance where he punched an anti-fascist counter-demonstrator in the face during another protest shortly after.  

“Prior to 1965, America was a white country, a country for European people,” Damigo said to those at his alma mater. “What’s actually happening right now is that we’re being replaced in our own country.”

The organization itself was founded in early 2016. Before Identity, Damigo joined the Marine Corps upon graduating high school, later serving in the Iraq war. After chasing down and robbing a cab driver at gunpoint for “looking Iraqi” back in 2007, he was dishonorably discharged and spent the next five years behind bars.  

“America was founded by white people. It was founded for white people. America was not founded to be a multiracial, multicultural society,” said Damigo in a June 2017 rally in Washington D.C.

The group also doesn’t hide their racist views–they take pride in it and wear it as a banner. Racial hierarchy, anti-Semitism and white national-identity all comprise the mission of this far-right organization, propagating a white American culture at the same time and recognizing itself as the antithesis to groups standing for multiculturalism, diversity and tolerance. They view these latter notions as globalist propaganda, Jewish conspiracies and anti-white ideas.

“It wasn’t clear enough that communism and anarchism are just two sides of the same Jewish shakel,” Damigo tweeted on August 2017.

Like most organizations similar to Identity Evropa,  this group routinely utilizes numerous propaganda methodologies, all with calculated purposes. These include, but not limited to, speeches, rallies, sharing videos, publishing on social media and taking part in demonstrations and protests, such as those in Charlottesville. As what UNC has experienced recently, this propaganda campaign includes posting flyers around selected locations by recruited members around the campus community. According to recent reports and statistics, this is becoming an increasingly more common occurrence.  

The intent behind placing these flyers around college campuses is multi-faceted. The first has already been stated: making their presence known. Another purpose of displaying these flyers is generating fierce responses, opening avenues for sweeping publicity, and potentially luring more followers. In a few words, the group thrives off attention and notoriety, growing more powerful from the effects of either result. Almost any outcome is hailed a success – even, for example, negative news coverage.

In early February, Deborah Lewis, a senior administrative specialist, shared an email on the behalf of Laura Connolly, UNC’s dean for the college of humanities and social sciences.

“Many groups purposely provoke an emotional response to their message and record and use that

response for their own promotion, recruitment and fundraising purposes, including lawsuits,” the email said. “Additionally, we encourage our community to be aware that groups such as Identity Evropa post messages and host events with the intent of garnering a reaction that brings additional attention to their cause.”

One of the most burning questions arising from this discussion is the notion of free speech and hate speech: what constitutes hate speech and where does it stand within the realms of free speech? According to UNC’s Guide to First Amendment Rights on Campus and Laura Connolly, hate speech only becomes problematic if the rhetoric incites violence or makes threats, therefore, some forms of hate speech are protected under the Constitution’s first amendment rights, even if it is racist or discriminatory.

“Although hate speech itself is free speech, what’s not protected is direct threats or when someone incites violence: that’s the biggest problem,” Connolly said.

Furthermore, UNC’s Guide to First Amendment Rights on Campus also states that the university doesn’t intervene “unless the speech incites riots or an immediate breach of the peace, disrupts lawful assembly, presents a threat to health and/or safety of individuals or damage/destruction to property, impedes faculty or staff in the lawful performance of their duties (including compliance with university policies), impedes students in the lawful pursuit of educational activities (including disruption of classes), is of a commercial nature, or is obscene (in some cases.”

The guide also makes clear that “postings of pamphlets, handbills, posters or flyers are allowed only on bulletin boards in campus buildings.”

It is also critical that the reader understands how this group operates. They specifically target recruits from younger generations – it’s the wheels turning this discriminatory machine. A fascist is one problem – when a one comes disguised in a clean-cut suit, well-groomed hair, and a smiling face, speaking fancy words, individuals tend to perceive them as more reputable. This is the leading cause in Identity Everopa’s accelerating momentum. It’s to forge a new identity, appearance, and character of the far-right movement, while staying true to its core principles.

Richard Spencer, an alt-right activist and former Identity Evropa member described it himself as “a young person’s movement.”

“Young people matter, and college campuses here have been where political battles have been fought since the ‘60s and before it,” said former CEO of Identity Evropa Eli Mosely. “This is where political change happens. Fundamentally, it’s where the most anti-white institution is.”

Identity Evropa is simply fascism in a twenty-first century framework: racism backed essentially with pseudo-intellectual magniloquence.  The main difference between them and other groups is that they refuse identifying themselves with the word “white supremacists.”

“We are not supremacists because we do not believe that White people should rule over non-White people. We are ethno-pluralists: We believe that all ethnic and racial groups should have somewhere in the world to call home,” CEO Patrick Casey said in an email to U.S. News.

After Damigo stepped down as CEO in late August 2017, Eli Mosely no sooner replaced him than when Casey took over. Casey makes clear the unchanging nature of his group, mentioning in a recent interview how “we are still going to be about white identity and representing the interests of people of European heritage here in America. Nothing has really changed in that regard.”

“The Mirror” has attempted reaching out to Identity Evropa, but they have yet to respond for comment.


Editor’s Note: On Monday, April 30, after this article was published, The Mirror received the following email from Identity Evropa Press Spokesman Sam Harrington:

“No spokesman or current representative has endorsed or supported the claims made about IE in the piece. In addition, Richard Spencer has never been a member or representative of Identity Evropa.

Perhaps we could have made further responses to Josh’s questions, but given that the About Us page answers many of them but Josh chose to simply not quote the numerous statements there and from current leadership, I’m not sure what use it would have been.

Take care.”

The Mirror reporter that wrote this article made repeated attempts to contact a representative of the Identity Evropa organization, and also utilized the organization’s “About Us” page. No representative or spokesman for the organization has responded to our staff or this article until now.


  1. “However, the group associates themselves with ‘cultural marxism.'”

    I don’t think the author understands what cultural marxism is by the wording of the last sentence in the paragraph. Cultural Marxism is something IE opposes, not associates with. I imagine this student went to the website, didn’t read anything on it, saw the Cultural Marxism education page and thought we were promoting it, not providing sources for what it was and why it is bad. As with most student journalists I have seen over the years, this guy doesn’t have a clue as to what he is talking about and is basically just parroting other articles he read about the group. So much so that large portions of this article are plagiarized.

  2. “We are ethno-pluralists.”

    I’ve not heard the term this guy used before so I looked it up. Seems like an interesting idea. Volentary separation of people’s worked very well following the USSR collapse. It seems like a more normal idea and group of people than the article gives presents them as. It seems mostly that they are doing completely legal and as they see it important awareness activism.

    Seems like most of this writing is trying to associate them with other movements or people.

    I saw they were also anti-war and doing cleanups and protest to opioids on the Twitter. Did the article writer looks the groups stuff there? It has a lot more than the website.

  3. Identity Evropa is none of those things. They are nice boys like my son and the SPLC are a bunch of bad apples who will put anyone on a list, even people who think abortion is wrong.

    You don’t have to agree that abortion is wrong ( I don’t for example) but putting someone on what amounts to a hitlist for their views? I’m sorry but that’s contrary to what America is all about.

  4. There are activists promoting Black interests, activists promoting Mexican interests, activists promoting Jewish interests. Why is it that whenever Whites organize for their collective interests they are immediately condemned as supremacists? We have to respect whatever gender people self-identify as, but when a group representing white interests explicitly says they are not supremacist and explains what they do in fact stand for, the press refuses to take them at their word. The SPLC is a hate mongering machine that is used by leftwing radicals to chill free speech. They’ve gone so far as to claim Maajid Nawaz, a liberal Muslim reformer, is an anti-Muslim extremist because he criticizes radical elements of Islam, and they’re being taken to court for their slander. Not a credible source.

  5. Really misleading and underresearched article. The author seems to have copied and pasted from 1 or two sources and repeats himself over and over with this new fad of calling my everyone a Nazi. Identity Evropa is an identitarian movement focused on its own people. That does not make them evil unless you think it’s evil for groups to care about themselves.

  6. Identity Evropa is a group of identitarian who are ethnopluralists and not white supremacists. They are certainly not neo-Nazis as this article claims. The claim is misleading at best.


    The ADL and SPLC have a history of lying about people to defame them. They have listed Ben Carson and Ayaan Hirsi Ali as hateful on very spurious grounds (they probably do this more out of political bias than any actual belief that their targets are hateful) and the claims they make about other people and groups should be taken with a grain of salt.

  7. My neighbor is a member of this group you just misunderstand. I think historically your orgainization has been racist towards European culture and heritage. The group does not support Nazi behavoir. Nor do they think the Europeans are supperior. The group clearly understands that East Asians have the highest average I.Q. and that the game of life is about survival and the best way to survive is within a ethnic group working toward the common goal of survival. The destruction of Europe only reinforces this belief system. The agenda of the SLPC is not so much a hidden agenda anymore. Happy May day and long live LIBERTY!

  8. The ADL and SPLC are not to be trusted. Even Starbucks has removed them from leading their upcoming anti-racial bias training. They are both left wing organizations who consistently demonize any group or organization who is slightly right of center or mildly conservative.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.